Shallow Attack by Columnist on Afrocentric Studies
By Leon Dixon
(printed
in the Kansas City Star on March 14, 1994
in
response to the February
16, 1994 Mona Charen article)
In a recent column in the
Star, Mona Charen woefully misses the mark in looking
at the motives of those who expound and promote Afrocentric
studies.
She bases her remarks on a
report from the Manhattan Institute, which clearly is no authority on the
subject. There are holes and miscues
throughout her assessment.
For starters, she states that
Stolen Legacy is “the seminal book on the subject.” Afrocentric
scholars do refer people to this book, but primarily novices.
She goes on to say that “scholars
of the ancient world” contradict assertions in that book. Afrocentrists (not
a monolithic group) can name plenty of such scholars who corroborate their
views.
For example, there are
English Egyptologists Sir E.A. Wallis Budge, Osiris & the Egyptian Resurrection, volumes 1 and 2; Gerald
Massey, Ancient Egypt the Light of the
World, volumes 1 and 2; and Sir William Matthew Flinders Petrie, The Making of Ancient Egypt and A History of Egypt, volumes 1, 2, and
3. All attest to the prominence of the negroid peoples and their cultures
in ancient
Charen seems to imply that
Consider: Why did the early Greeks like Archimedes,
Plato, Pythagoras and Solon among others go to
Martin Bernal of
Scholars, like George G.M.
James, its author, did their work under difficult circumstances. Unable to get grants, they worked largely at
their own expense just to get things done.
And they seldom get media access to discuss their research. Bernal acknowledges these scholars who tried
to keep these flickering light aglow as “old scrappers.”
Charen claims the Manhattan Institute study reveals that
“there is no empirical evidence that teaching about African civilization
improves the academic performance, personal situations or the life chances of
black students.”
There is plenty of evidence:
The Marcus Garvey School in
Afrocentric studies is multifaceted and analyzes a range if ideas
and disciplines as they relate to African peoples. One of the seminal things that Afrocentric scholars seek to study is why and how things
happened and evolved to the point they are now.
And not simply this for is own sake, but to gain some insight into what
can be done to set things aright.
Charen also claims the study reveals that “the content of
the major Afrocentric curricula is often racists and
frequently in error.”
What this curriculum does is
try and revise the curriculum that is consistently racist and erroneous in
virtually omitting blacks from any meaningful role in human history. Subjects that included blacks often cast them
in disparaging lights that blacks have had to pull teeth to change.
Afrocentric studies are about
the struggles that blacks have had to wage for centuries. And the Afrocentrists
are fully aware that it often makes some people so uncomfortable that they will
resort to categorize them as racists in a veiled attempt at self defense.
In her third point for the
study Charen says, “There are better and more honest
ways to teach about African history.”
The books she suggests are
apparently those with which whites feel comfortable. And they are good books. But there other important books that also
need to be read and studied. Afrocenric scholars are not willing to wait until they get
Eurocentric approval before delving into these materials.
Leon Dixon is a member of the National Black United
Front, co-founder and chairman of the board of the
W.E.B. DuBois
Learning Center Homepage | W.E.B. DuBois Learning Center Telehub Page